Drought Stress in Plants: Effects, Symptoms and Adaptation Mechanisms

Drought is one of the most damaging environmental stresses affecting plants. Unlike sudden injuries such as frost or mechanical damage, drought usually develops gradually. Soil moisture declines, roots begin to experience difficulty extracting water, leaf water status falls, stomata respond, photosynthesis slows, and the plant progressively shifts from growth to survival.

For a plant, drought is not simply “lack of rain.” It is a condition in which water availability becomes insufficient to maintain normal physiological, metabolic and developmental processes. The severity of drought stress depends on how much water is lacking, how long the stress continues, the developmental stage of the plant, soil characteristics, temperature, atmospheric humidity and the genetic ability of the plant to tolerate dehydration.

Because water is involved in nearly every aspect of plant function, drought affects the plant from the molecular level to the whole-plant level. Cell expansion, nutrient transport, stomatal behaviour, photosynthesis, respiration, membrane stability, hormone signalling and reproductive development can all be altered. Plants, however, are not passive during water shortage. They sense declining water availability and activate a highly coordinated set of morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular responses that help them avoid, tolerate or recover from stress. 

What Is Drought Stress in Plants?

Drought stress develops when the amount of water available to a plant is lower than the amount required to maintain normal growth and metabolism. As soil dries, its water potential becomes more negative, making it increasingly difficult for roots to extract water.

Water normally moves through the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum along a water-potential gradient. When soil water potential decreases substantially, roots cannot replace the water lost through transpiration quickly enough. As a result, plant water potential falls and cells lose turgor.

Turgor pressure is particularly important for cell expansion. This means that one of the earliest effects of drought is often reduced growth, even before severe wilting becomes visible.

Drought stress is therefore best understood as a progressive disturbance in plant water balance rather than as a single event.

A plant may experience mild, moderate or severe drought. Mild water deficit may trigger adaptive responses without causing permanent damage, while severe or prolonged dehydration can lead to membrane disruption, oxidative damage, irreversible tissue injury and eventually plant death.

Why Is Water So Important for Plants?

Water performs several functions simultaneously. It maintains cell turgor, serves as a solvent for biochemical reactions, supports nutrient transport, participates directly in photosynthesis, regulates leaf temperature through transpiration and facilitates long-distance transport through xylem.

When water becomes limiting, many processes begin to compete with one another.

Closing stomata, for example, helps conserve water but simultaneously reduces carbon dioxide entry into leaves. Restricting shoot growth conserves resources, yet it also reduces leaf area available for photosynthesis. Maintaining deep root growth may improve access to soil moisture, but carbon invested in roots cannot simultaneously be used for shoot expansion.

This balance between growth and survival is one of the central features of plant responses to drought.

Early Symptoms of Drought Stress

One of the difficulties in recognising drought stress is that physiological changes begin before dramatic visual symptoms appear.

The earliest responses often include reduced leaf expansion, decreased stomatal conductance and slower shoot growth. Cells become less able to maintain turgor as water becomes less available, so newly developing tissues are often affected first.

Leaves may appear slightly dull, softer than normal or temporarily wilted during the warmest part of the day. In some species, leaves begin to roll, fold or change orientation. These movements reduce the leaf area directly exposed to sunlight and can help limit water loss.

As drought progresses, symptoms become more obvious. These can include:

• wilting
• leaf rolling or folding
• reduced leaf size
• slower stem elongation
• premature leaf senescence
• yellowing or chlorosis
• leaf shedding
• dry or scorched leaf margins
• reduced flowering
• poor fruit or seed development
• reduced biomass and yield

The exact appearance depends strongly on plant species, developmental stage and environmental conditions.

A drought-tolerant plant may remain visibly healthy while already making major physiological adjustments, whereas a sensitive species may wilt quickly even under moderate water deficit.

Loss of Cell Turgor and Growth Inhibition

One of the first processes affected by drought is cell expansion.

Plant cells enlarge when water enters the vacuole and generates turgor pressure against the cell wall. Under water deficit, cellular water potential declines and turgor pressure falls.

As a result, expanding tissues become unable to maintain normal growth.

Young leaves may remain smaller, internodes may become shorter and overall plant height can decline.

Drought can also reduce cell division and differentiation when stress becomes prolonged. Together, these effects produce smaller leaves, shorter shoots and reduced biomass.

Interestingly, root and shoot growth do not always respond equally.

During moderate drought, plants may maintain or even favour root growth while strongly restricting shoot growth. This changes the root-to-shoot ratio and allows more resources to be directed toward soil exploration.

Under severe drought, however, even root growth becomes inhibited. 

Effects of Drought on Stomata

Stomata are microscopic pores on the leaf surface surrounded by two guard cells. They regulate both carbon dioxide uptake and water loss.

When water becomes scarce, plants commonly reduce stomatal opening.

This is one of the fastest and most important drought responses because most water lost by plants escapes through stomata during transpiration.

Stomatal closure therefore helps conserve water.

However, this protection has a metabolic cost.

Carbon dioxide enters leaves through the same stomatal pores. When stomata close, internal CO₂ availability falls, limiting carbon fixation in the Calvin cycle.

Thus, drought creates a central physiological dilemma:

the plant must save water while still obtaining enough carbon dioxide for photosynthesis.

During mild drought, the reduction in photosynthesis is often largely caused by stomatal limitation. Under stronger or longer-lasting drought, damage or inhibition within the photosynthetic machinery itself can become increasingly important.

Abscisic Acid: A Major Drought Signal

The hormone abscisic acid, or ABA, plays a central role in plant responses to water deficit.

As soil and plant water status decline, ABA levels often increase in roots and leaves. ABA participates in root-to-shoot signalling and triggers changes in guard-cell ion transport that promote stomatal closure.

At the molecular level, ABA binds to PYR/PYL/RCAR-family receptors. This inhibits PP2C phosphatases and allows SnRK2 protein kinases to activate downstream proteins and transcription factors involved in drought responses.

One important target is the guard-cell anion channel SLAC1, whose regulation contributes to ion loss from guard cells. Water follows osmotically, guard-cell turgor decreases and the stomatal pore closes.

ABA signalling also activates many drought-responsive genes involved in osmotic adjustment, antioxidant defence, protective proteins and other stress-related processes.

However, drought signalling is not controlled exclusively by ABA. Calcium signals, reactive oxygen species, hydraulic changes, electrical signals and other plant hormones all participate in the drought-response network. 

Effects of Drought on Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is highly sensitive to water limitation.

In the early stages of drought, reduced stomatal opening lowers CO₂ diffusion into leaves. This decreases the substrate available for RuBisCO and slows carbon assimilation.

As stress becomes more severe, additional limitations can appear.

Drought can affect chlorophyll concentration, thylakoid organisation, Photosystem II activity, electron transport, ATP production and Calvin-cycle enzymes.

The abundance or activity of proteins involved in carbon fixation may also decline during prolonged stress.

Severe water deficit can therefore change photosynthesis from primarily a stomatal problem into a combination of stomatal, biochemical and photochemical limitations.

If absorbed light energy cannot be efficiently used for carbon fixation, excess excitation energy may contribute to the formation of reactive oxygen species.

This is one reason why drought stress and oxidative stress are often closely connected. 

Chlorophyll Loss and Leaf Yellowing

Leaf yellowing is common during prolonged drought, although it is not unique to drought stress.

Water deficit can accelerate chlorophyll degradation and reduce chlorophyll synthesis, particularly during severe or extended stress.

As chlorophyll levels decline, leaves lose their normal green colour and photosynthetic capacity falls.

Drought can also accelerate leaf senescence.

From the plant’s perspective, senescence is not always simply a sign of failure. Under prolonged water shortage, older leaves can be sacrificed so that nutrients and resources are remobilised to younger tissues, reproductive organs or storage structures.

Reducing total leaf area also lowers the surface available for transpiration.

Reactive Oxygen Species Under Drought

Reactive oxygen species, commonly abbreviated as ROS, are naturally produced during cellular metabolism.

Important forms include superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen.

At controlled concentrations, ROS function as signalling molecules. Under severe stress, however, their production can exceed the capacity of antioxidant systems.

This produces oxidative stress.

Drought can enhance ROS production in chloroplasts, mitochondria and other cellular compartments because electron transport and metabolic reactions become imbalanced.

Excess ROS can oxidise membrane lipids, proteins, pigments and nucleic acids.

Damage to membrane lipids causes increased membrane permeability, which is why electrolyte leakage is frequently measured as an indicator of drought-induced cellular injury.

Plants therefore need strong antioxidant systems to keep ROS within a manageable range.

Antioxidant Defence During Drought

Plants use both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to limit oxidative damage.

Important antioxidant enzymes include:

Superoxide dismutase (SOD), which converts superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide.

Catalase (CAT), which breaks hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen.

Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and other peroxidases, which also participate in hydrogen peroxide detoxification.

Non-enzymatic antioxidants include ascorbate, glutathione, carotenoids, tocopherols and many phenolic compounds.

An efficient antioxidant response does not eliminate ROS completely. That would actually be undesirable because ROS also participate in signalling.

Instead, successful stress tolerance depends on maintaining ROS at concentrations that permit signalling without allowing uncontrolled oxidative injury.

Osmotic Adjustment

One of the most important mechanisms used by plants under drought is osmotic adjustment.

As water becomes less available, cells can accumulate solutes that lower their osmotic potential.

This helps them retain water and maintain turgor even when external water potential becomes more negative.

Plants accumulate a range of compatible solutes, including:

• proline
• soluble sugars
• glycine betaine
• sugar alcohols
• certain organic acids and amino acids

These compounds are called compatible because they can accumulate at relatively high concentrations without severely interfering with normal cellular metabolism.

Their roles extend beyond osmotic adjustment.

Some can stabilise proteins and membranes, protect cellular structures, participate in ROS scavenging and act as metabolic or signalling molecules.

Proline accumulation is particularly well known and is frequently used as a biochemical marker of plant responses to drought, although high proline concentration does not automatically mean that a plant is more drought tolerant.

Its significance depends on species, tissue, developmental stage and stress severity. 

Root Responses to Drought

Roots are the first organs to experience declining soil moisture, and root architecture is a major determinant of drought adaptation.

Under moderate water deficit, many plants allocate relatively more carbon below ground.

This may promote deeper rooting, greater root length or exploration of soil regions where water remains available.

The effectiveness of this strategy depends on where water is located in the soil.

A deep-root system may be advantageous in environments where moisture persists at depth, while a dense shallow root system may be useful where rainfall occurs frequently but only wets upper soil layers.

Root hairs, lateral roots and root hydraulic conductivity can also change during drought.

Aquaporins, which are membrane proteins that facilitate water movement across cell membranes, can be regulated in response to changing water availability.

Root systems are therefore dynamic structures whose development and water-transport capacity respond continuously to soil conditions.

Leaf Rolling, Reduced Leaf Area and Morphological Adaptation

Plants can alter their architecture to reduce water loss.

Leaf rolling is common in grasses such as wheat, rice and maize. By rolling the leaf blade inward, plants reduce the effective surface area exposed to radiation and moving air.

Other species develop smaller leaves or reduce leaf expansion during drought.

Some plants shed older leaves.

Long-term adaptation to dry environments can involve thicker cuticles, wax deposition, sunken stomata, dense trichomes or specialised leaf shapes.

These characteristics differ from short-term stress responses because they may be genetically fixed or developmentally established adaptations.

Xerophytic plants are particularly well adapted to persistent water scarcity.

Succulents, for example, store large quantities of water in fleshy tissues, whereas many desert shrubs possess extremely deep or extensive root systems.

Drought Escape, Drought Avoidance and Drought Tolerance

Plant responses to drought are often grouped into three broad strategies: escape, avoidance and tolerance.

Drought escape involves completing critical stages of the life cycle before severe drought develops.

Annual plants in dry environments may germinate after rainfall, grow rapidly, flower early and produce seeds before soil water is exhausted.

Drought avoidance involves maintaining relatively favourable tissue water status even when the environment becomes dry.

Deep roots, stomatal closure, reduced leaf area and waxy surfaces can contribute to drought avoidance.

Drought tolerance refers more specifically to the ability of tissues to continue functioning despite low water potential or partial dehydration.

Osmotic adjustment, membrane protection, antioxidant defence and stress-protective proteins contribute to this ability.

In reality, many plants combine all three strategies to different degrees.

Drought Effects on Nutrient Uptake

Nutrient acquisition depends strongly on water.

Mineral nutrients move toward roots through diffusion and mass flow, and they are transported upward through the xylem.

When soil becomes dry, nutrient mobility declines.

Reduced transpiration can also decrease nutrient transport from roots to shoots.

Root growth and membrane transport processes may be altered as well.

Consequently, drought-stressed plants may develop nutrient imbalances even when the soil contains adequate nutrients.

Nitrogen metabolism is particularly sensitive.

In legumes, water deficit can reduce nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation because both the plant and its symbiotic bacteria require favourable water conditions.

This combination of water limitation and nutrient limitation can further suppress photosynthesis and growth. 

Effects on Respiration and Energy Metabolism

Drought also modifies respiration.

The response is complex because respiration may increase, decrease or change in different tissues depending on stress intensity and duration.

Under moderate stress, plants require energy to support ion transport, repair, antioxidant systems and synthesis of protective molecules.

However, severe dehydration can inhibit mitochondrial metabolism.

Meanwhile, reduced photosynthesis lowers carbohydrate supply.

The balance between carbon gain through photosynthesis and carbon consumption through respiration therefore becomes increasingly important during prolonged drought.

If respiration continues to consume stored carbohydrates while photosynthetic carbon fixation remains strongly limited, carbon reserves may become depleted.

Effects on Reproductive Development

Reproductive stages are often particularly sensitive to water shortage.

Drought occurring during flowering, pollen development, fertilisation or early seed formation can cause disproportionately large yield losses.

Pollen viability may decline, flowers may abort and fertilisation success may fall.

In cereal crops, drought around flowering or grain filling can reduce grain number, grain size or both.

Reduced photosynthesis also limits the carbohydrates available for developing reproductive organs.

This explains why two drought events of similar severity can have very different effects on yield depending on when they occur during the plant life cycle.

Hydraulic Failure

Water moves from roots to leaves through xylem under tension.

During severe drought, this tension becomes increasingly negative.

If the tension becomes too great, air bubbles can form and spread within xylem conduits, producing embolism.

Embolised conduits lose the ability to transport water effectively.

If enough of the hydraulic system becomes blocked, leaves and stems can experience severe dehydration.

Plants differ considerably in the vulnerability of their xylem to embolism.

Xylem anatomy therefore plays an important role in drought resistance, particularly in woody plants.

Drought survival frequently involves a trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and hydraulic safety.

Hormonal Crosstalk During Drought

ABA is central to drought responses, but it operates within a larger hormonal network.

Auxins influence root growth and architecture.

Cytokinins affect shoot growth, senescence and source–sink relationships.

Ethylene can influence senescence, abscission and root responses.

Jasmonates, salicylic acid, brassinosteroids and strigolactones can also interact with drought signalling pathways.

The behaviour of any one hormone therefore depends partly on the concentrations and signalling states of others.

This hormonal crosstalk allows plants to coordinate responses across tissues rather than treating drought as a single isolated signal. 

Calcium and ROS as Drought Signals

Calcium ions act as important intracellular second messengers.

When plant cells perceive osmotic or mechanical changes associated with declining water availability, calcium concentrations in the cytosol can change rapidly.

Different calcium signatures can activate calcium-dependent protein kinases and other signalling proteins.

ROS also participate in signalling.

Hydrogen peroxide, in particular, can act as a mobile signalling molecule when maintained at controlled levels.

ABA, calcium and ROS signalling are strongly interconnected.

Together, they help regulate guard-cell behaviour, gene expression, antioxidant activity and metabolic adjustment.

Current research is still uncovering how plants initially sense changes in water potential and how these local signals are integrated into whole-plant responses. 

Molecular Responses and Drought-Responsive Genes

Drought causes extensive changes in gene expression.

Some genes encode proteins that directly protect cells, whereas others encode regulatory proteins that control downstream stress responses.

Important drought-related transcription-factor families include DREB/CBF, AREB/ABF, NAC, MYB, MYC, bZIP, WRKY and AP2/ERF proteins.

These transcription factors interact with specific regulatory sequences in DNA and modify the expression of large networks of stress-responsive genes.

Some pathways are strongly ABA-dependent, while others can operate partly independently of ABA.

This is important because drought is not perceived through a single linear pathway.

Instead, plants use interconnected signalling networks with considerable redundancy and cross-regulation. 

LEA Proteins and Cellular Protection

Late embryogenesis abundant proteins, generally called LEA proteins, are frequently associated with dehydration tolerance.

They were originally studied extensively in seeds, where tissues naturally undergo substantial water loss during maturation.

Many LEA proteins are also produced in vegetative tissues during drought.

They are thought to contribute to stabilisation of proteins, membranes and other cellular structures during dehydration.

Other protective proteins, including molecular chaperones and heat-shock proteins, can assist with protein folding and prevent damaged proteins from aggregating.

These systems become particularly important when water loss begins to disrupt the normal structure of cellular macromolecules.

Cuticle and Wax Deposition

The plant cuticle forms a hydrophobic barrier over the epidermis.

Although stomata account for much of leaf water loss under normal conditions, cuticular water loss becomes increasingly important when stomata are largely closed.

Many plants respond to drought by altering cuticular wax composition or increasing wax deposition.

A thicker or more hydrophobic surface can help reduce non-stomatal water loss.

These traits have become of considerable interest in crop breeding because improved cuticular properties may enhance water conservation without directly restricting CO₂ entry through stomata.

However, the benefits depend on the environment and crop type.

Drought and Photorespiration

As stomata close during drought, internal CO₂ concentration can decline.

Under these conditions, RuBisCO is more likely to catalyse oxygenation rather than carboxylation, particularly at high temperatures.

This increases photorespiration in C3 plants.

Photorespiration reduces the efficiency of net carbon fixation because previously fixed carbon is released as CO₂ and energy is consumed.

However, photorespiration should not simply be described as harmful.

Under some stress conditions it can help dissipate excess reducing power and interact with antioxidant and nitrogen metabolism.

Its role during drought is therefore more complex than merely representing lost photosynthetic efficiency.

C3, C4 and CAM Plants Under Drought

Different photosynthetic pathways strongly influence plant responses to water limitation.

C3 plants are generally more vulnerable to reductions in internal CO₂ because RuBisCO directly fixes atmospheric CO₂ in mesophyll cells.

C4 plants possess a CO₂-concentrating mechanism that elevates CO₂ around RuBisCO in bundle sheath cells.

This suppresses photorespiration and often gives C4 species high water-use efficiency under warm conditions.

CAM plants take water conservation even further.

They typically open their stomata at night, when temperature is lower and relative humidity is higher. CO₂ is initially fixed into organic acids and stored, then released internally during the day while stomata remain largely closed.

This temporal separation makes CAM particularly advantageous in arid environments.

It is important, however, not to interpret C4 or CAM metabolism as universal drought tolerance. Root traits, hydraulic properties, growth strategy and species-specific physiology remain critically important.

Water-Use Efficiency

Water-use efficiency describes how much carbon a plant gains relative to the amount of water it loses.

At the leaf level it is often considered in terms of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation relative to transpiration or stomatal conductance.

Plants can temporarily improve intrinsic water-use efficiency by partially closing stomata, because water loss may decline faster than carbon uptake.

However, extremely strong stomatal closure eventually restricts photosynthesis substantially.

Therefore, maximum water conservation is not necessarily the same as maximum productivity.

Crop improvement aims to achieve an appropriate balance between water use and carbon gain rather than simply creating plants with permanently closed stomata.

Beneficial Microorganisms and Drought Adaptation

Plants interact continuously with microorganisms in the rhizosphere.

Certain plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and beneficial fungi can improve drought responses.

Reported mechanisms include modification of root architecture, altered hormone signalling, enhanced nutrient uptake, accumulation of osmoprotectants, improved antioxidant capacity and production of extracellular polysaccharides that influence soil–root interactions.

Some microbes can also affect expression of drought-responsive genes.

These relationships are increasingly being investigated as possible components of sustainable drought-management strategies.

However, microbial effects are strongly context dependent. A strain that improves drought tolerance in one crop or soil may not perform identically under different environmental conditions. 

Drought Memory and Acclimation

Plants that experience a mild drought and later encounter another drought may sometimes respond differently from plants experiencing stress for the first time.

This phenomenon is often called stress memory or drought priming.

Previous exposure can alter gene expression, chromatin states, metabolite concentrations, antioxidant capacity and physiological behaviour.

Some of these changes persist after the initial stress disappears.

When drought returns, the plant may activate certain protective responses more quickly or strongly.

The duration and biological significance of this memory vary considerably among species, tissues and experimental conditions, and it remains an active field of research. 

Recovery After Drought

Surviving drought is only part of the challenge.

Plants must also recover after water becomes available again.

Rehydration can reopen stomata, restore photosynthesis and restart growth, but recovery is not always immediate.

Plants that experienced only moderate stress may recover quickly.

Severely droughted plants may retain damaged photosystems, embolised xylem, altered membranes or depleted carbohydrate reserves.

Rapid rehydration can also cause abrupt metabolic changes and temporary oxidative stress.

Drought tolerance should therefore be evaluated not only by survival during water deficit but also by the capacity to recover after rewatering.

Drought Stress and Crop Productivity

Drought is particularly important in agriculture because yield depends on both plant survival and sustained productivity.

A crop that survives extreme water deficit but produces little grain is not necessarily agriculturally useful.

Breeding therefore focuses on combinations of traits such as suitable root architecture, efficient stomatal regulation, stable photosynthesis, reproductive resilience, hydraulic safety and effective osmotic adjustment.

Modern breeding increasingly combines conventional selection with physiological phenotyping, genomic selection, marker-assisted breeding, transcriptomics, metabolomics and gene editing.

Researchers are also studying whether specific transcription factors, signalling proteins, aquaporins, cuticular traits and carbon-allocation pathways can be modified without causing unwanted growth penalties.

This is difficult because many drought-response mechanisms involve trade-offs.

For example, stronger stomatal closure saves water but can suppress photosynthesis. Increased root growth may improve water uptake but demands carbon resources. Early flowering can allow drought escape but may reduce yield potential under favourable conditions.

Successful drought adaptation therefore depends on optimisation rather than on a single “drought tolerance gene.”

Why Drought Adaptation Is So Complex

There is no universal drought-tolerance mechanism because drought itself is not a uniform stress.

A short period of water deficit early in vegetative growth is biologically different from a prolonged terminal drought during grain filling.

Likewise, slowly drying soil generates different responses from sudden dehydration.

Temperature, vapour-pressure deficit, soil texture, root depth, nutrient availability and previous stress exposure all modify the plant response.

This explains why results obtained in controlled laboratory experiments do not always translate directly into field performance.

A drought-tolerant crop must function under changing environments where several stresses may occur simultaneously, including high temperature, salinity and nutrient limitation.

Conclusion

Drought stress begins with a shortage of available water, but its consequences spread across virtually every level of plant biology.

Reduced water availability lowers cell turgor and restricts growth. Stomata close to limit transpiration, but CO₂ uptake falls and photosynthesis declines. Prolonged stress can disrupt chloroplast function, nutrient uptake, reproductive development and cellular membranes while promoting ROS accumulation and oxidative damage.

Plants respond through a remarkably coordinated network of adaptations. Roots explore water sources, stomata regulate water loss, ABA and other signalling molecules coordinate stress responses, compatible solutes support osmotic adjustment, antioxidant systems limit ROS damage and protective proteins help preserve cellular structures. Longer-term adaptations can include altered root architecture, reduced leaf area, stronger cuticles, specialised hydraulic traits and changes in developmental timing.

The most successful drought response is therefore not one single mechanism. It is the integration of water conservation, continued carbon acquisition, cellular protection, signalling, growth regulation and recovery capacity.

Understanding these interactions is becoming increasingly important as plant scientists work to develop crops that can maintain productivity under increasingly variable water availability.

References

Seleiman, M. F., Al-Suhaibani, N., Ali, N., Akmal, M., Alotaibi, M., Refay, Y., Dindaroglu, T., Abdul-Wajid, H. H., & Battaglia, M. L. (2021). Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 10(2), 259.

Takahashi, F., Kuromori, T., Urano, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2020). Drought stress responses and resistance in plants: From cellular responses to long-distance intercellular communication. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 556972.

Zhu, J. K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2), 313–324.

Yoshida, T., Mogami, J., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2014). ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 21, 133–139.

Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K., Shinozaki, K., & Tran, L. S. P. (2014). Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 86.

Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 185–212.

Verslues, P. E., Agarwal, M., Katiyar-Agarwal, S., Zhu, J., & Zhu, J. K. (2006). Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. The Plant Journal, 45(4), 523–539.

Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551–560.